Re: Using Dynamic Proxies?

• To: ozone-dev@ozone-db.org
• Subject: Re: Using Dynamic Proxies?
• From: Falko Braeutigam <falko@smb-tec.com>
• Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:57:52 +0200
• Delivered-To: lars@smb-tec.com
• Delivered-To: ozone-dev-list@smb-tec.com
• Delivered-To: ozone-dev@smb-tec.com
• In-Reply-To: <CFE2AF2B1DB7D4118E9B00508B44085213E58E@inphna_mal2_dc.inphact.com>
• Organization: SMB
• References: <CFE2AF2B1DB7D4118E9B00508B44085213E58E@inphna_mal2_dc.inphact.com>
• Reply-To: ozone-dev@ozone-db.org
• Sender: owner-ozone-dev@ozone-db.org

On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, you wrote:
> I was wondering if/when ozone was moving to dynamic proxies? 

AFAIK nobody is working on this. We don't even have the benchmark numbers that
compare dynamic against generated proxies, as we discussed it earlier. Shouldn't
be a real problem but unfortunately nobody is willing/able/whatever to actually
tackle this one. Would you like to help us out here?


Falko
-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Falko Braeutigam                              mailto:falko@smb-tec.com
SMB GmbH                                        http://www.smb-tec.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a message:         mailto:ozone-dev@ozone-db.org
Unsubscribe:            mailto:ozone-dev-request@ozone-db.org?body=unsubscribe
Contact adminstrator:   mailto:ozone-dev-owner@ozone-db.org
Read archived messages: http://www.ozone-db.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Using Dynamic Proxies?
    • From: David Li <david@digitalsesame.com>

• References:
  • Using Dynamic Proxies?
    • From: ntran@InPhact.com

• Prev by Date: Using Dynamic Proxies?
• Next by Date: RE: Using Dynamic Proxies?
• Prev by thread: Using Dynamic Proxies?
• Next by thread: Re: Using Dynamic Proxies?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread