Re: Object Creation in ozone

[Falko Braeutigam <falko@smb-tec.com>]

On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Don Berendsen wrote:
> I would think that preventing "the ctor does not work..." and related object 
> creation questions might be better addressed by more comprehensive 
> documentation on the subject.
Although I tend to prefer stubs too, I'm not yet entirely sure. An API that
forces the programmer to do the right things (without reading to much
documentation) seems to be the best API one can get. Not?

> As I get more familiar with ozone architecture 
> and usage I'll write up some material on this.
Would be great!


Falko

> Thanks again for addressing the issue.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> don
> 
> 
> >From: Falko Braeutigam <falko@smb-tec.com>
> >To: "Don Berendsen" <donberendsen@hotmail.com>, ozone-users@ozone-db.org
> >Subject: Re: Object Creation in ozone
> >Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:36:35 +0200
> >
> >On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Don Berendsen wrote:
> > > Having stubs rather than abstract methods seems preferable to me. Falko,
> > > what do you see as the pros/cons of each way?
> >
> >As Charles mentioned, abstract methods reminds the programmer of the ozone
> >architecture. It helps programmers to get started with ozone (and prevents
> >us from to many "the ctor does not work..." questions ;) Stubs on the other
> >hand help to reduce code size.
> >
> >
> >Falko
> >--
> >______________________________________________________________________
> >Falko Braeutigam                              mailto:falko@smb-tec.com
> >SMB GmbH                                        http://www.smb-tec.com
> >
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Falko Braeutigam                              mailto:falko@smb-tec.com
SMB GmbH                                        http://www.smb-tec.com